Philosophy of the Film: Epistemology, Ontology, Aesthetics

Examines the overlap among movie and philosophy in 3 particular methods: epistemological matters in film-making and viewing; aesthetic thought and picture; and picture as a medium of philosophical expression.

Show description

Quick preview of Philosophy of the Film: Epistemology, Ontology, Aesthetics PDF

Similar Aesthetics books

Iranian Cinema and Philosophy: Shooting Truth (Literatures and Cultures of the Islamic World)

In movie reviews, Iranian motion pictures are stored at a distance, as 'other,' various, and unique. In reponse, this booklet takes those movies as philosophically proper and leading edge. each one bankruptcy of this book is dedicated to studying a unmarried movie, and every bankruptcy specializes in one thinker and one specific aesthetic query.

The Field of Cultural Production

Over the last twenty years, sociologist Pierre Bourdieu has develop into a dominant strength in cultural job starting from flavor in song and paintings to offerings in nutrients and existence. the sector of Cultural construction brings jointly Bourdieu's significant essays on artwork and literature and gives the 1st advent to Bourdieu's writings and idea of a cultural box that situates inventive works in the social stipulations in their construction, move, and intake.

Philosophers on Art from Kant to the Postmodernists: A Critical Reader

Right here, for the 1st time, Christopher Kul-Want brings jointly twenty-five texts on artwork written by way of twenty philosophers. protecting the Enlightenment to postmodernism, those essays draw on Continental philosophy and aesthetics, the Marxist highbrow culture, and psychoanalytic concept, and every is followed by means of an outline and interpretation.

Duchamp and the Aesthetics of Chance: Art as Experiment (Columbia Themes in Philosophy, Social Criticism, and the Arts)

Marcel Duchamp is frequently seen as an "artist-engineer-scientist," a type of rationalist who relied seriously at the principles of the French mathematician and thinker Henri Poincaré. but an entire portrait of Duchamp and his a number of affects attracts a unique photo. In his three commonplace Stoppages (1913-1914), a piece that makes use of probability as a creative medium, we see how a ways Duchamp subverted scientism in prefer of a thorough individualistic aesthetic and experimental imaginative and prescient.

Extra resources for Philosophy of the Film: Epistemology, Ontology, Aesthetics

Show sample text content

Not just are the goods exchanged in any such society diversified, however the kinds of relationships that males needs to forge among themselves for one of these society to paintings are fairly various from what went prior to. the most obvious objection to this is often that it really is beside the point. That an artist will depend on others is not any topic; if the artist selects them and vets their product then he can nonetheless declare the accountability and for this reason the credits or discredit. This turns out to were real of the good portray workshops. department of labour not more detracts from the painter than it does from the film­maker. This answer is useful and real. It exhibits us that the matter isn't the department of labour regularly however the specific type of confusion the department of labour brings to motion pictures. It confuses us at the very query at factor: who's the film­maker? Or, even extra strongly formulated, is there anyone one that could be labelled ‘the’ film­maker? during this publication i've got written every now and then approximately administrators, as if it have been elementary that motion pictures ‘belong’ to administrators. Now it's time to right that effect. within the actual international there's a working argument among assorted claimants to the honorific of ‘creator of the film’. along with the director, the case has been made for the screenwriter, the artistic manufacturer, and probably even the studio. a few Marxist analysts of ideology characteristic motion pictures to capitalism—they being a part of its ideological equipment. such a lot of sires for this type of baby, there has to be a gravely tempting inheritance ­201­ at stake? probably not. additionally, those arguments are ordinarily irresoluble, in reality resoluble basically piecemeal. For definite reasons MGM movies will be lumped jointly and mentioned; for different reasons the paintings of a manufacturer, director or author will be. Or does this sound anodyne? it isn't meant to. The hassle is we're off on a hunt for the artistic artist, the hand (hidden or differently) to whom the paintings will be attributed. The department of labour argument is going to the purpose that such attributions are tough to make. This argument can't be handled until we attend to what we're attempting to speak about and what standards of authorship and accountability we have now in brain. allow us to, due to the fact they're either mass­produced, examine motion pictures to books. we don't mostly pass judgement on a ebook by means of its typography, simply because typography is generally no a part of the author of the book’s bailiwick. nine will we say an identical of a film’s images, is that comparable to typography? not likely, seeing that precisely how a shot is photographed provides vital details and nuance, so it really is extra like a high quality of the prose in a publication. what's the an identical of typography? good, the celluloid is. So if a movie is jerky in projection, or there's a surprising switch within the photograph colors, for this we don't blame or compliment the movie maker. In discussing books we wish to discover who authored the strings of phrases that make it up. Paper, print, binding, expense will not be suitable. yet because the strings of pictures and sounds which make up the movie can't yet be generated via many, how lets assign authorship?

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.85 of 5 – based on 11 votes